Date: Tuesday, 07 February 2023
07 February 2023
A draft “action file on Libya” is circulating within the Council of the EU. A version from January obtained by Statewatch indicates that there will be a fresh push to improve the ability of authorities in Libya to control the country’s southern borders and to prevent refugees from leaving the country by sea.
Support our work: become a Friend of Statewatch from as little as £1/€1 per month.
Image: European External Action Service, CC BY-NC-ND 2.0
The aim of the action file (pdf) is to “identify short- and medium-term actions” to “contribute to more effective Libyan border and migration management, prevent irregular departures, and reinforce search and rescue capacities, whilst fostering better respect for fundamental rights of migrants and international obligations of the Libyan authorities.”
This will include “an updated mapping of the main public actors in the migration field in Libya, notably in border management,” with the aim of developing “a common understanding on which public actors in Libya the EU is ready to engage with on migration.”
The mapping should also be used to develop “a set of guiding principles to foster cooperation with the Libyan authorities on migration in accordance with human rights and international obligations.”
This task will apparently be given to the Council working group dealing with the Maghreb and Mashreq, known as MAMA, which will be “enforced with migration experts from Member States.”
“Libya” was listed on the agenda of a MAMA meeting on 30 January (pdf), but it is unknown whether the action file was part of the discussion. If MAMA produces minutes of its meetings, they are neither listed nor publicly accessible through the Council’s register of documents.
The objective listed in the action file most likely to raise eyebrows is: “Prevent irregular departures through increased efforts to counter human trafficking, criminal and smuggling networks”.
Once the mapping has been completed, the action file says the EU should “support relevant Libyan entities in countering migrant smuggling and trafficking in human beings and dismantling criminal networks,” with the Commission, European External Action Service, Frontex, Europol and the member states given leading roles.
The Commission is the only institution given specific tasks in the draft action file, including the disbursal of some €61 million for different law enforcement projects and programmes, although it is clear that the precise amount to be awarded to Libyan authorities has not yet been decided.
The following objective concerns “more effective border management and reinforce search and rescue capacities in respect of human rights”.
There will be continued support to the €59 million project “Support for Integrated Border and Migration Management in Libya (SIBMMIL),” which is implemented by the Italian interior ministry, with the document noting that SIBMMIL has paid for “technical parts of an MRCC [Maritime Rescue Coordination Centre] which have been delivered and are not used.”
The Commission is also to launch two new actions worth €10 million to support Libya’s supposed MRCC and “the training academy for border guards in Libya.”
The Commission is also tasked with “setting-up a Rescue Coordination Group and developing arrangements for more coordinated search and rescue and interception operations, by linking up Maritime Rescue Coordination Centres in Libya and Tunisia with their equivalents in Italy and Malta.”
These efforts targeted at preventing irregular departures from the Libyan coast will come alongside work to try to strengthen the country’s southern borders: “all EU actors involved in Libya, including Frontex, as well as the CSDP [Common Security and Defence Policy] missions/operations” should “support southern border controls, particularly in relation to Niger and Chad.”
Other actions set out in the plan include:
“Resume/pursue dialogue with the Libyan authorities to promote human rights, allow unhindered access to detention centres for international and humanitarian organisations; promote and support alternatives to detention with the objective of putting an end to arbitrary detention; work towards the evacuation of vulnerable migrants from detention centres”