In yet another blockbuster news-report from the great independent investigative journalist, Seymour Hersh, headlined on March 22nd “THE COVER-UP: The Biden Administration continues to conceal its responsibility for the destruction of the Nord Stream pipelines”, he reported that the counter-story that had been published on March 7th and 8th in Rupert Murdoch’s London Times and in the New York Times and in Germany’s Die Zeit, alleging that the Nord Stream pipelines had been bombed by unprofessional Ukrainians, was a U.S. Government utterly fictitious plant that was aimed to compete with if not discredit his own truthful account of the explosions, which said that Joe Biden had himself ordered and overseen this destruction, and that Biden keeps on lying about the matter, and his media keep on carrying his propaganda to deceive the public about it:
There is no evidence that any reporter assigned there [to the White House, etc] has yet to ask the White House press secretary whether Biden had done what any serious leader would do: formally “task” the American intelligence community to conduct a deep investigation, with all of its assets, and find out just who had done the deed in the Baltic Sea. According to a source within the intelligence community, the president has not done so, nor will he. Why not? Because he knows the answer.
This performance by the mainstream press is exactly in line with many other prior such instances, such as when George W. Bush and Tony Blair started their lying-campaign about “Saddam’s WMD” on 7 September 2002 by saying that the IAEA was the source for their information and the ‘news’-media refused to report that the IAEA repeatedly denied it.
There is so much documentation on the non-credibility of mainstream ‘news’ (actually propaganda) media in The West, so that only fools and extremely closed-minded individuals any longer subscribe to or otherwise patronize them. Unfortunately, however, much that is published even by non-mainstream ‘news’-media in The West is just as untrustworthy, and much of that, also, like all of the mainstream ones, is also owned by billionaires whose interest in publishing truth is slim to none. Consequently: ONLY totally independent non-mainstream journalists (ones that no billionaire would hire or financially back because it is “too true”) are even worthy of being considered, at all. Hersh is certainly in this category.