From: wolda002@umn.edu
Date: Tue Nov 03 2009 - 03:21:24 EST
http://www.worldpoliticsreview.com/articlePrint.aspx?ID=4527
In Sudan, the Pitfalls of Advocacy-Led Foreign Policy 
Alan Boswell | 30 Oct 2009 
As the highly publicized rollout of the new U.S. policy on Sudan made 
clear, Sudan has become an unlikely foreign policy priority for the Obama 
administration. For this, the Sudanese can thank the Darfur advocacy 
movement, which effectively put the nation on the map for the American 
public over the past six years.
Sudan certainly deserves every bit of attention it receives. If Africa's 
largest nation again implodes, it threatens to further destabilize what is 
already an unstable region of the world.
But the internal tension hidden within President Barack Obama's newly 
formulated Sudan policy is that Darfur is no longer the main attraction. 
Not even close.
To be sure, the Darfur conflict is not yet resolved. But the crisis is no 
longer actively boiling over either. Instead, a fragile equilibrium has 
emerged, in which clashes between Khartoum-linked militias and the 
splintered rebel forces have become few and far between. The Darfuri 
people, meanwhile, lack a definitive voice, and the numerous feuding rebel 
groups make any chance to forge a political peace deal elusive.
Millions of Darfuris remain in refugee camps across the border in Chad and 
the Central African Republic. They point to the ongoing insecurity back 
home to explain why they are not returning. While there's truth to that 
rationale, the underlying and often unspoken reality is that there is now 
little for them to go back home to. While this is certainly an unpleasant 
situation, it is hardly a unique one in a continent filled with unresolved 
refugee and IDP issues. By this measure, Darfur no longer demands the 
urgent priority it once deserved.
Meanwhile, the growing rift between North and South Sudan becomes a graver 
threat all the time. With the exception of an 11-year lull, the North-South 
civil war raged from 1955 until the 2005 deal known as the Comprehensive 
Peace Agreement (CPA), and by its end had killed more than 2 million 
people. The CPA ended the hostilities, creating an interim joint government 
between the two sides, with provisions for national elections and 
ultimately an independence referendum in the South. The elections have been 
delayed twice and are now scheduled for April 2010. The independence 
referendum -- the climax of the entire six-year process -- is a mere 14 
months away. By all accounts, the nation is on a path to fatally fail both 
critical tests should the current climate of escalating tensions continue.
South Sudan holds most of the country's vital oil fields, a fact which 
makes Khartoum unlikely to just let the South walk away without further 
intense wealth-sharing negotiations. Whether the 2005 agreement was an 
actual "peace agreement" or simply a ceasefire remains to be seen. But with 
both sides actively upgrading their arms in anticipation of renewed 
clashes, a new Sudanese Civil War could quickly dwarf all other conflicts 
on the already troubled continent.
The ticking North-South time bomb inevitably became Scott Gration's top 
priority as the Obama administration's newly appointed special envoy to 
Sudan. Given the unenviable task of trying to prevent the complete 
deterioration of North-South relations, the former general has found it 
necessary to engage with an administration many back home consider the 
expression of pure evil.
But Americans know little about the CPA or the Sudanese civil war. So to 
justify spending such diplomatic capital on another failing African state, 
at a time when vital American interests are being actively threatened 
elsewhere, the new policy document squeezes mediating the North-South feud 
in between "saving" Darfur and preventing Sudan from regressing back into a 
terrorist haven -- two familiar objectives for the U.S. media and public.
At the press conference unveiling the new policy, Secretary of State 
Hillary Clinton and U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice followed the published 
document's lead, discussing the humanitarian situation in Darfur before 
moving on to the CPA talks. But the man on the ground, Mr. Gration, flipped 
this order, an indication that he clearly considers the North-South 
hostilities his main focus.
The reality of U.S. domestic politics when it comes to Sudan has put 
Gration in a thorny situation. The pragmatic necessity to treat the 
ICC-indicted Khartoum regime as a legitimate player has proven difficult 
for the Darfur advocacy groups to swallow -- even as they, too, try to 
adjust by shifting their focus increasingly to the North-South split. But 
giving effective support to the behind-closed-doors, high-stakes diplomacy 
necessary to prevent a war is a very different kind of campaign than that 
of mobilizing the political will to end a genocide and demand justice 
against its perpetrators. Advocacy groups are well-suited for the latter. 
Whether they can succeed in constructively engaging the former remains to 
be seen.
Whatever the international community's approach to Sudan, its effectiveness 
will largely be determined by the degree to which the Sudanese players hear 
a single, coordinated voice from their foreign interlocutors. As analysts 
for the Center for Strategic and International Studies note, the new policy 
of pragmatic engagement brings the U.S. approach closer in line with that 
of the other main international players, such as the U.K., the EU, and 
Sudan's African neighbors.
Preventing a new humanitarian disaster in Sudan will require a sustained 
intervention from now through the scheduled referendum in early 2011 -- and 
beyond. The new U.S. policy gives Gration a flexible framework and some 
breathing room in which to work. His overall effectiveness, however, may 
largely depend on whether he is granted the same space to breathe from his 
critics back home as well.
Alan Boswell is a journalist based in Nairobi, Kenya, covering the eastern 
Africa region. He can be reached at alandboswell [at] gmail [dot] com.
Photo: Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, January 
2009 (U.S. Navy photo by Spc. 2nd Class Jesse B. Awalt).
         ----[This List to be used for Eritrea Related News Only]----