[dehai-news] (IPS) Ethnic Federalism Could Lead to Election Violence


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Biniam Tekle (biniamt@dehai.org)
Date: Mon Sep 21 2009 - 14:56:26 EDT


ETHIOPIA:
Ethnic Federalism Could Lead to Election Violence
Omer Redi

Credit:Omer Redi

Ethiopia’s Prime Minster Meles Zenawi, who has been in power for 18 years
and who is expected to stand for another five-year term of office, has
dismissed the ICG report.

ADDIS ABABA, Sep 21 (IPS) - Criticised as system of dividing and ruling
people according to their ethnic groups, Ethiopia’s federalism has just
become a bone of contention.

A recent international report warns if this system, and the resultant lack
of governance, continues the entire Horn of Africa could be destabilised.

The report by the International Crisis Group (ICG) warned that unless the
ruling coalition, Ethiopian Peoples’ Revolutionary Democratic Front (EPRDF),
improved governance it would risk ethnic conflict from the over 70 different
ethnic groups in the country during the 2010 federal and regional elections.
The ICG also cautioned the entire Horn of Africa could be destabilised
because of the expected conflict.

But Ethiopia’s Prime Minster, who has been in power for 18 years and who is
expected to stand for another five-year term of office, has dismissed the
report. "The report is not worth the price of writing it up," Prime Minister
Meles Zenawi said.

But not everyone is in agreement. The opposition have denounced the system
of ethnic federalism as a way for the EPRDF to stay in power, while
academics have said that it is a system that remains impossible to
implement.

The opposition has agreed with the report saying that there is a high
probability for ethnic conflict in the upcoming elections.

"The system (of rule) has not satisfied neither those who supported
federalism nor the ones who opposed it," Dr. Merera Gudina told IPS. Merera
is Co-Chair of the opposition Oromo Federalist Congress (OFC). The Oromo
ethnic group is the country’s largest. "This unfair and undemocratic system
dominated by one (Tigrayan) ethnic group (the strong base of the ruling
part) will lead to crisis. That is why I think ICG’s report is prepared with
superior understanding of the realities in Ethiopia."

Ethnic federalism is a system of administration where regional states -
formed based on geographical settlement of ethnic groups - share part of
their power with a central government to run their collective affairs on
their behalf.

The EPRDF introduced the federal administrative system over 14 years ago
when it established the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia. This was
three years after it ousted the Derg, the dictatorial communist government,
concluding 17 years of civil war.

The report stated that despite the structure crafted for decentralised
administration, because the EPRDF has power in all the regions, it controls
all matters. In effect the regions do not have actual power and they don’t
actually govern themselves, the report noted.

The ICG alleges the system has increased ethnic polarisation in Ethiopia.
"Ethnic federalism has not dampened conflict, but rather increased
competition among groups fighting for land, natural resources,
administrative boundaries and government budgets", says François Grignon,
ICG’s Africa Program Director. "This concept has powerfully promoted ethnic
self-awareness among all groups and failed to accommodate grievances," he
said.

The report stated that while ethnic federalism was initially greeted with
enthusiasm by Ethiopia’s people, it has failed to resolve the country’s
national issue – "a democratic country free of any dominance by any ethnic
group".

"Instead it generates greater conflict at local level, as ethnic groups
fight over political influence. That policy has empowered some groups but
has not been accompanied by dialogue and reconciliation on grievances over
past misdeeds," the report stated.

But government denies this and believes that Ethiopia is now a more united
state than before. It boasts that previously marginalised communities now
enjoy self governance and control their own resources and have better access
to public services.

According to the new constitution the country is divided into 9 regions
based on the geographical settlement of ethnic groups, and two chartered
administrations (Addis Ababa city and Diredawa town) both with mixed-ethnic
population.

The Federal Government is responsible for national defence, foreign
relations, and general policies of common interests and benefits. Regional
States are vested with legislative, executive and judicial powers for
self-administration.

However, the regional governments have serious constraints from lack of
adequate financial and human resources to effectively carry out the
management of decentralised administration and development.

Some opposition politicians criticise the system as a "divide-and-rule"
approach the EPRDF devised to ensure it will not be challenged.

"The only thing EPRDF’s federalism has achieved is that it helped the party
hold tight grip on the people through divide-and-rule system," said Merera,
who is also a professor of Political Science and International Relations at
the Addis Ababa University. Though Merera says OFC supports genuine
federalism, he strongly opposes Ethiopia’s current system saying it is
neither negotiated by the people nor does it have a democratic content.

"It is a system EPRDF redrew Ethiopia the way it wanted simply because it
came to power," he told IPS.

Political analysts including the current Dean and professor at the Addis
Ababa University, Department of Political Science and International
Relations, Dr. Yaekob Arsano, critically opposed the federal system when it
was tabled for discussion almost 16 years ago.

"Ethnic federalism is neither politically correct nor technically possible
to apply in Ethiopia’s context," he had said.

A core argument against ethnic federalism is that considering the
intermarriage among most ethnic groups in Ethiopia, "it is impossible to
clearly define and demarcate regional boundaries".

The ICG report concluded that economic growth and the expansion of public
services are to the EPRDF’s credit, but they increasingly fail to translate
into popular support from the people.

As opposition parties gear up to challenge the EPRDF in the June 2010
elections, many fear a violent crackdown by the government, similar to the
intimidation, harassment and violence experienced by opposition parties
during the 2005 elections, ICG alleges.

In the aftermath of the May 2005 elections, a wave of violence between
opposition protestors and government forces erupted and more than 200 people
were killed. Following that some opposition accused the government of
harassing some people for belonging to a certain ethnic group.

But Degife Bula, Speaker of Ethiopia’s House of Federation has said the
"report has not considered the actual context in Ethiopia at all".

The House of Federation is the highest institution on matters of the federal
system and was formed with at least one representative from each ethnic
group.

But Degife blames the ICG for not seeking comments from the House of
Federation while compiling a report on issue that is completely under its
jurisdiction. "They [ICG] have prepared the report with information
collected from researches of smaller scopes by such institutions like NGOs
and media organisations here and there," Degife told IPS.

The House of Federation is formally mandated to deal with nationality issues
and federal-regional relations, but it meets only twice a year and lacks the
authority to effectively mitigate ethnic conflicts; it has been reluctant to
approve referendums to decide the status of disputed localities, according
to ICG.

In conclusion ICG suggests that the current federal system may need to be
modified, but it is unlikely Ethiopia can return to the old unitary state
system.

"The international community has ignored or downplayed the problems. Some
donors consider food security more important than democracy in Ethiopia. In
view of the mounting ethnic awareness and political tensions created by the
regionalisation policy, however, external actors would be well advised to
take the governance problems more seriously and adopt a more principled
position towards the Meles Zenawi government," ICG says.

(END/2009)

         ----[This List to be used for Eritrea Related News Only]----


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

webmaster
© Copyright DEHAI-Eritrea OnLine, 1993-2009
All rights reserved