[dehai-news] (TimesOnline) How to navigate the new global archipelago


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Yemane Natnael (yemane_natnael@yahoo.com)
Date: Sat Aug 30 2008 - 09:13:31 EDT


How to navigate the new global archipelagoThe Georgian crisis has revealed the changed rules of international diplomacy. Barack Obama had better learn them fast.August 29, 2008

By Nader Mousavizadeh

div#related-article-links p a, div#related-article-links p a:visited {
color:#06c;
}

As Russia decides where to draw its new boundary with Georgia a reckoning will
be due - among the people of Georgia living amid the wreckage of a failed
gamble, and among their Western allies suddenly confronted with diplomatic
impotence. But for Barack Obama, a different kind of reckoning is taking
place: what happens when the formidable political instincts of the probable
next US president meet the limits of his experience in national security.

From everything he has said and written, it is evident that Mr Obama, uniquely
among leading US politicians, understands the new contours of global affairs
- that the world won't be divided into neat categories of democracies versus
autocracies, nor will it converge toward a Western model.

He knows instead, that a world of parts is emerging - of states drifting
farther away from each other into a global archipelago of interests and
values; and that in an archipelago world, appeals to freedom, democracy and
human rights must compete with aims of stability, resource security and the
projection of national power.

And yet, as the Georgian conflict spirals into a global crisis, Mr Obama finds
himself on the back foot. Initially hesitant in his response to Vladimir
Putin's expedition in South Ossetia, he has had to ratchet up his rhetoric
in response to John McCain's for-us-or-against-us stance.

This is, as Obama the politician would know, a loser's game, even if Obama the
statesman is still finding his way. Trying to out muscle Mr McCain will
invite only contempt among his foes and bewilderment among the millions of
his supporters yearning for a different kind of US engagement with the
world.

Georgia is only the most recent augury of a new era of zero-sum diplomacy for
which the West is ill-prepared. The West's surprise at Russia's response was
disconcerting enough.

More troubling was the outdated assortment of threats
with which it has tried to sound tough. Among the suggestions was a boycott
of the 2014 Winter Olympics hosted by Russia, denying Russia membership of
the World Trade Organization and excluding it from G8 meetings. A common
thread links all three: they are as difficult for the West to achieve as
they are unlikely to alter Russia's behavior.

Obtaining an Olympic boycott six years after the crisis in Georgia will be
extremely challenging. Barring access to the WTO just after the collapse of
the Doha talks may be less of a sanction than it sounds.

The G8 threat is even less convincing, although it is telling evidence of a
20th-century mindset that is oblivious to international changes. Before
Georgia it would have been hard to find anyone seriously arguing for the
importance of G8 meetings (Canada and Italy are members; China is not); much
less that being denied entrance could be construed as leverage with a great
power.

Far more important to the future of international diplomacy was a
little-noticed meeting in Yekaterinburg, Russia, last May. There, for the
first time, foreign ministers from the so-called Bric countries (Brazil,
Russia, India and China) met to advance their common agenda in a world
hitherto defined by Western rules. The Brics are expected to overtake the
combined GDP of the G7 by 2035, and laid down a marker that they will not
wait for reform of the post-Second World War institutions to be heard.

Does this mean that China or India will take Russia's side against the West?
Not necessarily, but it does suggest a more complex interplay of interests
in future. Strategic leverage will have to be earned - crisis by crisis,
interest by interest.

Where Iran is concerned (to cite the West's principal pre-Georgia concern), it
ought to be apparent that our interests are not identical with those of
China, India or even Saudi Arabia.
 China must balance its concern over
Iran's destabilizing behavior with its need for secure oil supplies. Russia
will weigh its unease with Iran's nuclear programme against its interest in
counteracting US dominance in the Gulf. And Iran's Arab neighbors are
hedging their preference for US hegemony in the Gulf with the knowledge that
the Persian presence is for ever while distant empires come and go. To gain
the support of each of these for any effective policy of containment,
concessions must be granted - in the region or elsewhere.

Which brings us to the real lesson of the Georgian debacle: Tbilisi's freedom
to challenge Russia had already been traded away by its Western allies -
whether they realized it or not. When Kosovo declared independence in
February, a senior European official remarked that the West would pay a
price for its decision to offer recognition in the face of fierce Russian
opposition.

Specifically, he noted that it was likely to happen at a Nato meeting when the
Ukrainian and Georgian bids for membership were to be discussed. He was
right. At the April meeting, their applications were put on the back burner,
demonstrating to Moscow that for some Nato members there was such a thing as
a legitimate Russian sphere of interest.

The lesson is not that the West was wrong to recognise Kosovo or that Nato was
right to delay Georgia's membership. Rather, it is to suggest that we
increasingly live in a world of choices. We may be able to enjoy the
satisfaction of supporting the Kosovans or encouraging the Georgians, but we
may not be able to do so without paying a price in another arena.

If this appears daunting, imagine the time not too distant when China, Brazil,
India and a dozen smaller but significant powers begin to align strategic
aims with economic power in their dealings with the West. Avoiding a global
zero-sum game will require a President Obama as shrewd as he is inspiring.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/guest_contributors/article4628259.ece

      

         ----[This List to be used for Eritrea Related News Only]----


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

webmaster
© Copyright DEHAI-Eritrea OnLine, 1993-2008
All rights reserved