From: wolda002@umn.edu
Date: Wed Jul 02 2008 - 00:20:05 EDT
GLOBE EDITORIAL
The same old politics of terror
June 29, 2008
WHEN ASKED about the effect of another terrorist attack on American soil,
John McCain's chief strategist, Charlie Black, responded rashly and
bluntly. "Certainly it would be a big advantage" for McCain, Black told
Fortune magazine recently. Similarly, the strategist described the
assassination of Pakistan's Benazir Bhutto in December as "an unfortunate
event," but said "it helped us" in the contest for the nomination.
It would be unfair to McCain, and to Black, to take this analysis as an
indication that the Republican team is hoping for or counting on a
terrorist incident. Still, Black's observation does bring up the question
of whether the threat of terrorism will help Republicans, or whether the
politics of security have shifted since the last presidential election.
Is Black right to assume that McCain would benefit politically after
another terrorist atrocity in the United States? The subject came up when
the Fortune interviewer first asked McCain "what single economic threat he
perceives above all others" and McCain, after a long silence, said: "Well,
I would think that the absolute gravest threat is the struggle that we're
in against radical Islamist extremism."
Perhaps McCain is merely determined to stay on message, so much so that he
answers an economics question from a business magazine with a non sequitur
that is supposed to play to his ostensible strength, national security. Or
perhaps McCain would rather not talk about foreclosures, the credit crisis,
disappearing jobs, healthcare, and tax policy - economic issues in which
Republican dogma and public sentiment diverge significantly.
Regardless, McCain is ignoring the ever more evident flaws in President
Bush's notion of a war against an enemy called terrorism. If McCain is only
proposing more of the same, he needs to explain why Al Qaeda and its allies
appear stronger and more sophisticated than ever. If Defense Secretary
Robert Gates is right to say, "It is just plain embarrassing that Al Qaeda
is better at communicating its message on the Internet than America," why
is this so? Why are Al Qaeda and the Taliban able to threaten Afghanistan
again, as they are now doing?
Bush's war on terrorism may have offered an excuse to flout the US
Constitution and expand executive power, but it has not been going all that
well. McCain should recognize that the next president needs to enhance
national security by improving perceptions of the United States in the
Muslim world. Unfortunately, his comments, and Black's, suggest that
Republicans have learned nothing from Bush's mistakes.
--
Million.
Mpls MN
***HeGeRey ZBeLet LBe GhiDN'u Kt'ReKeBi AsBei***
AWET N'HAFASH!!!
----[This List to be used for Eritrea Related News Only]----