[dehai-news] (Guardian/UK) Revealed: the letter Obama team hope will heal Iran rift

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Tsegai Emmanuel (emmanuelt40@gmail.com)
Date: Thu Jan 29 2009 - 02:53:28 EST

Revealed: the letter Obama team hope will heal Iran rift Symbolic gesture
gives assurances that US does not want to topple Islamic regime

   - *Robert Tait* <http://www.guardian.co.uk/profile/roberttait> and *Ewen
   MacAskill* <http://www.guardian.co.uk/profile/ewenmacaskill> in
   - guardian.co.uk <http://www.guardian.co.uk/>, Thursday 29 January 2009
   01.44 GMT

 [image: An Iranian walks past an American flag]

One draft urges Iranians to consider the bene? ts of losing their pariah
status in the west. Photograph: Vahid Salemi/AP

**Officials of Barack Obama <http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/barackobama>'s
administration have drafted a letter to
Iran<http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/iran>from the president aimed at
unfreezing US-Iranian relations and opening the
way for face-to-face talks, the Guardian has learned.

The US state department has been working on drafts of the letter since Obama
was elected on 4 November last year. It is in reply to a lengthy letter of
congratulations sent by the Iranian president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, on 6

Diplomats said Obama's letter would be a symbolic gesture to mark a change
in tone from the hostile one adopted by the Bush administration, which
portrayed Iran as part of an "axis of evil".

It would be intended to allay the ­suspicions of Iran's leaders and pave the
way for Obama to engage them directly, a break with past policy.

State department officials have composed at least three drafts of the
letter, which gives assurances that Washington does not want to overthrow
the Islamic regime, but merely seeks a change in its behaviour. The letter
would be addressed to the Iranian people and sent directly to Iran's supreme
leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, or released as an open letter.

One draft proposal suggests that Iran should compare its relatively low
standard of living with that of some of its more prosperous neighbours, and
contemplate the benefits of losing its pariah status in the west. Although
the tone is conciliatory, it also calls on Iran to end what the US calls
state sponsorship of terrorism.

The letter is being considered by the new secretary of state, Hillary
Clinton, as part of a sweeping review of US policy on Iran. A decision on
sending it is not expected until the review is complete.

In an interview on Monday with the al-Arabiya television network, Obama
hinted at a more friendly approach towards the Islamic Republic.

Ahmadinejad said yesterday that he was waiting patiently to see what the
Obama administration would come up with. "We will listen to the statements
closely, we will carefully study their actions, and, if there are real
changes, we will welcome it," he said.

Ahmadinejad, who confirmed that he would stand for election again in June,
said it was unclear whether the Obama administration was intent on just a
shift in tactics or was seeking fundamental change. He called on Washington
to apologise for its actions against Iran over the past 60 years, including
US support for a 1953 coup that ousted the democratically elected
government, and the US shooting down of an Iranian passenger plane in 1988.

The state department refused to comment yesterday on the draft letters.

US concern about Iran mainly centres on its uranium enrichment programme,
which Washington claims is intended to provide the country with a nuclear
weapons capability. Iran claims the programme is for civilian purposes.

The diplomatic moves are given increased urgency by fears that Israel might
take unilateral action to bomb Iranian nuclear facilities.

The scale of the problem facing the new American president was reinforced
yesterday when a senior aide to Ahmadinejad, Aliakbar Javanfekr, said that,
despite the calls from the US, Iran had no intention of stopping its nuclear
activities. When asked about a UN resolution calling for the suspension of
Iran's uranium enrichment, Javanfekr, the presidential adviser for press
affairs, replied: "We are past that stage."

One of the chief Iranian concerns revolves around suspicion that the US is
engaged in covert action aimed at regime change, including support for
separatist groups in areas such as Kurdistan, Sistan-Baluchestan and

The state department has repeatedly denied that there is any American
support for such groups.

In its dying days, the Bush administration was planning to open a US
interests section in the Iranian capital Tehran, one step down from an
embassy. Bush's secretary of state, Condoleezza Rice, said that never
happened because attention was diverted by the Russian invasion of Georgia.
Others say that rightwingers in the Bush administration mounted a rearguard
action to block it.

The idea has resurfaced, but if there are direct talks with Iran, it may be
decided that a diplomatic presence would obviate the need for a diplomatic
mission there, at least in the short term.

While Obama is taking the lead on policy towards Iran, the administration
will soon announce that Dennis Ross will become a special envoy to the
country, following the appointments last week of George Mitchell, the
veteran US mediator, as special envoy to the Middle East, and Richard
Holbrooke, who helped to broker the Bosnia peace agreement, as special envoy
to Pakistan and Afghanistan.

Ross, who took a leading role in the Middle East peace talks in Bill
Clinton's administration, will be responsible on a day-to-day basis for
implementing policy towards Iran.

In a graphic sign of Iranian mistrust, the hardline newspaper Kayhan, which
is considered close to Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, has denounced Ross as a
"Zionist lobbyist".

Saeed Leylaz, a Tehran-based analyst, said a US letter would have to be
accompanied by security guarantees and an agreement to drop economic
sanctions. "If they send such a letter it will be a very significant step
towards better ties, but they should be careful in not thinking Tehran will
respond immediately," he said.

"There will be disputes inside the system about such a letter. There are lot
of radicals who don't want to see ordinary relations between Tehran and
Washington. To convince Iran, they should send a very clear message that
they are not going to try to destroy the regime."


         ----[This List to be used for Eritrea Related News Only]----

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

© Copyright DEHAI-Eritrea OnLine, 1993-2009
All rights reserved