AricanArguments.org: Kenyan gloom and ineffective authoritarianism: free-form thinking on the state of Eastern Africa

From: Berhane Habtemariam <Berhane.Habtemariam_at_gmx.de_at_dehai.org>
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2014 17:41:18 +0200

Kenyan gloom and ineffective authoritarianism: free-form thinking on the
state of Eastern Africa


- By Magnus Taylor


Posted on
<http://africanarguments.org/2014/07/07/kenyan-gloom-and-ineffective-authori
tarianism-free-form-thinking-on-the-state-of-eastern-africa-by-magnus-taylor
/> July 7, 2014

I've had the happy opportunity to participate in a couple of discussion
seminars/roundtable events over the past 10 days on the East African region.
Here are some thoughts and reflections. What follows is intended as a
discussion opener, rather than as anything definitive.

On Kenya, pessimism abounds.

For a country styling itself as the 'strategic hub' of East Africa, there is
an awful lot of gloom going around about the state of Kenya's politics. In
fact, analysis is as pessimistic as I've seen it for about 5 years.

Much of this is justified given the partisan, ethnicised nature of the
government under Uhuru Kenyatta, the demands for a 'National Dialogue' and
unfolding 'Saba Saba'-style demonstrations coming from Raila Odinga's CORD,
and the spate of Al-Shabaab perpetrated (or inspired?) terrorist attacks -
currently in the process of crippling the tourist industry.

The narrative of gloom states that the mercifully peaceful 2013 elections
weren't a sign that Kenya had worked through its political problems, but
rather that during this election period they were not acted on.

The government, however, learned from the 07/08 experience and got a much
better handle on security during the election. The opposition realised it
could not call its people out onto the streets despite deep unhappiness at
the way the polls were conducted.

High profile terror attacks (notably Westgate and Mpeketoni) are a
consequence of Kenya's risky adventurism in Southern Somalia, but they also
indicate that the security and intelligence services do not have a handle on
what is, admittedly, an extremely challenging problem. Arbitrarily arresting
many of the country's Somali population is, however, probably not a good way
of stemming the growth of a home-grown islamist movement.

This insecurity is also now having negative impact on investor perceptions.
I heard from an employee of an oil company operating in the region that they
have assigned a "business critical" status to all travel to Nairobi at
present. It will be increasingly difficult (and expensive) to recruit
skilled people to work in Kenya.

The Kenyatta administration is aggressive but relatively ineffective. For
the first 12 months it seemed like its major task was getting its leader off
his ICC charge. Since this appears to have been achieved it doesn't have a
clear strategic direction. Those members of the government who have the
capacity to drive a real programme of reform are too busy making money while
it's their turn to eat.

.but economics may outpace it

There is, however, some analytical tension here as Kenya remains the most
important country in the East African region. It has the biggest and most
dynamic economy, the most sophisticated metropolitan hub and the best
strategic position. The country's economy grew at a fair clip over the past
decade, particularly under Kibaki, despite severe political instability
surrounding the 07/08 election (and the fallout from the global economic
downturn).

I can't help but wonder whether economic rationality will eventually trump
political dysfunction. Powerful and competent people in Kenya will surely
take hold of the agenda, kick the security services into action and crack
down on the most destructive instances of corruption. Politics apart, Kenya
has much going for it.

Oil and gas could transform the region, but not as quickly as hoped

Out of 7 countries you might conceivably place within the ambit of East
Africa (Kenya, Uganda, South Sudan, Somalia, Tanzania, Rwanda and Burundi) 5
have oil or gas either being exported (South Sudan), being developed (Kenya,
Uganda and Tanzania) or in existence, but unexploited due to political
instability (Somalia). This, for good or ill, is a major change.

Geographically, these countries can broadly be fitted around the theoretical
Kenyan hub. South Sudan though continues to look north towards the Republic
of Sudan via the pipeline to Port Sudan, and given the rumbling civil war,
the prospect of building an alternative route southwards (as part of the
LAPSETT corridor) is remote. As an industry professional stated "there are
hydrocarbons there [in East Africa], the question is how difficult will it
be to extract them?"

Of the 'new' oil finds, Uganda was the first in 2006. However, as previously
<http://africanarguments.org/2014/04/28/we-shall-manage-you-oil-ngos-and-jou
rnalists-in-uganda-by-magnus-taylor/> discussed here, development of the
asset has been delayed by, amongst other things, political wrangles over the
construction of an oil refinery within Uganda - a pet project of the
President, but one for which the business case is not compelling.

Kenya's oil developments are moving faster (and may beat Uganda to First
Oil), but are situated in the traditionally ignored Turkana district -
moving people and resources to the region is difficult, expensive and
insecure.

Tanzania's offshore LNG finds are potentially the most significant single
discovery in the region. However, violent protests have already taken place
in the south, in Mtwara, which will be the country's LNG hub.

Despite the development of a Chinese-financed pipeline from Mtwara to Dar es
Salaam, things are likely to move slowly, especially given the approaching
general election in 2016. After a delay of a year the government only
published a gas policy in December 2013

Last week a report was leaked suggesting that the Tanzanian government had
<http://africanarguments.org/2014/07/04/leaked-agreement-shows-tanzania-may-
not-get-a-good-deal-for-gas-by-ben-taylor/> failed to negotiate itself a
good deal over its Production Sharing Agreement with Statoil. Vocal
opposition MP Zitto Kabwe responded to this story,
<http://zittokabwe.wordpress.com/2014/07/04/tanzania-to-lose-up-to-1b-under-
statoil-psa-open-these-oil-and-gas-contracts/> writing in his blog: "For
Tanzania to transform our wealth in natural resources to benefit the entire
society, TRANSPARENCY must be a key. Let us make a campaign to make all
these contracts in Oil and Gas open."

Developmental authoritarianism requires competence to achieve anything

Whatever you think about Paul Kagame's regime in Rwanda, there is no denying
that the RPF gets things done. Rwanda, however, remains hamstrung by its
geography - what do you produce when you're a small, poorly-connected
country in Central Africa with an under-educated workforce?

Neighbouring Uganda has authoritarian tendencies with power tightly held
within the hands of the ruling family and no prospect of a transition. But
Uganda, like Kenya, has a competence problem. Authoritarianism seems to work
well within the political realm - both countries have been effective at
neutering the media and civil society and have won elections, but not in
actually making things work (trains run on time etc.)

I'm sure citizens of Kenya and Uganda would trade a bit of their current
pseudo-democracy for better run public services. At present they have
neither.

Magnus Taylor is Editor of African Arguments.

 
Received on Mon Jul 07 2014 - 11:41:46 EDT

Dehai Admin
© Copyright DEHAI-Eritrea OnLine, 1993-2013
All rights reserved