GGA.org: Khartoum doldrums

From: Berhane Habtemariam <Berhane.Habtemariam_at_gmx.de_at_dehai.org>
Date: Mon Dec 1 16:21:29 2014

Khartoum doldrums


A divided opposition offers Sudanese citizens little hope for change

by James Copnall

Dec 01, 2014

This author has no biography yet.

In June 2012 and September 2013, young Sudanese took to the streets in
several cities, including Khartoum, the capital, and Omdurman, the nation's
commercial hub. They threw rocks at police and set up makeshift barriers in
back alleys. Burning tyres sent columns of smoke twisting into the sky.

 

The partial and then full removal of fuel subsidies sent prices soaring and
fuelled these riots. In many of these protests, demonstrators called for the
removal of President Omar al-Bashir and his regime, which they blamed for
years of war and the growing economic crisis that followed the secession of
oil-rich South Sudan in 2011.

 

In power since 1989, Mr Bashir is Sudan's longest-serving leader. His
25-year rule has been one of the most divisive periods in the country's
turbulent history. Millions of Sudanese oppose him and his National Congress
Party (NCP). In theory, this should strengthen formal political avenues for
dissent such as opposition parties. Instead, they grow weaker and less
relevant each year.

 

Opposition parties did not organise the 2012 and 2013 demonstrations. The
protests ignited spontaneously or were organised by youth protest groups.
One of the reasons Mr Bashir and the NCP have survived so long is that many
Sudanese are unwilling to take risks for the opposition because they are not
convinced these parties would run the country any better than the ruling
party.

 

The history of independent Sudan's political parties explains this
reluctance. For decades after the country raised its flag in 1956, different
iterations of two sectarian forces dominated Sudanese politics: the National
Umma Party (NUP) and the Democratic Unionist Party (DUP). The NUP's support
is largely drawn from the Ansar, an Islamic sect. Its leader, Sadiq
al-Mahdi, is both imam of the Ansar and the NUP leader. Like many of the
Sudanese elite, he has been around for decades-he served briefly as prime
minister in the late 1960s. The DUP, which originally wanted Sudan to form a
union with Egypt, is based on a similar model. Mohammed Osman al-Mirghani is
both the imam of the Khatmiyya sect and the DUP head.

 

These parties have been in and out of government since 1956, often as part
of unstable coalitions in the democratic interludes between periods of
military rule. Many progressive Sudanese have objected to the lack of
democracy within these parties and their quasi-feudal relationship with
their largely rural support base. Those looking for alternative politics
were once largely split into two currents: the communists and the Islamists.
The former have dwindled in significance, following domestic repression and
the end of the cold war. The latter grew in strength, from a base in the
universities, and under the leadership of hardline ideologue Hassan
al-Turabi. The Islamists convinced President Jaafar Numeiri to introduce
sharia or Islamic law in 1983, exacerbating the conflict with the largely
non-Muslim southern Sudan.

 

When Mr Bashir seized power in 1989, he was under the de facto control of Mr
Turabi, as explored in "A History of Modern Sudan" by Robert Collins. For a
decade Mr Turabi's Islamists, backed by Mr Bashir's military might, pursued
a radical course. They banned opposition parties and dismantled the powerful
trade union movement. Many Sudanese fled into exile. In 1999 Mr Bashir won a
power struggle with Mr Turabi, which led to a new sort of political
opposition in Sudan: disaffected Islamists. Mr Turabi formed his Popular
Congress Party (PCP) in 1999. In late 2013, a veteran NCP Islamist, Ghazi
Salaheddin, dismayed by the brutal suppression of the September protests,
formed his own Reform Now party, also along Islamist lines.

 

By then, Mr Mirghani and the DUP had entered into a coalition government
with Mr Bashir's NCP. Ahead of the 2010 elections, most of the opposition
parties were grouped in a loose coalition, the National Consensus Forces
(NCF). Since those elections, which Mr Bashir won comfortably, the NCF
leaders have routinely made declarations about "taking to the streets", a
call for popular protests to bring about regime change. Their threats have
been empty. Popular protests have been either spontaneous or led by
amorphous youth groups like Sudan Change Now and Girifna ("We are fed up" in
Arabic).

 

The relative failure of the NCF and the old opposition parties to mobilise
Sudanese opposition is a result of at least four factors. First, it is
extremely difficult to operate as an opposition party in Sudan. The
government does not allow public demonstrations or rallies without
permission, and permission is never granted. Sudanese opposition leaders
also get little access to state media, which is still the way most of their
countrymen access news. Security forces often arrest critical voices too:
the NUP's Mr Mahdi spent a month in jail in mid-2014 after he criticised
alleged atrocities committed by Sudanese military forces in Darfur.

 

Second, many Sudanese simply do not believe the Sudanese opposition would be
better than the government. The same figures have been in charge of the
opposition parties for decades, and were not particularly successful at
earlier stints running the country. Mr Mahdi's second period as prime
minister, from 1986-1989, is remembered for political instability and
economic chaos. Many now wonder whether the ageing luminaries Mr Mahdi or Mr
Mirghani have anything new to add. Both are critical of the regime in public
but have ties to the government: both have sons who accepted high-profile
posts within Mr Bashir's administration. "Sadiq [al-Mahdi] is with the
government, then against it; you cannot trust him," says one young man in
Khartoum who asked to be known only as Ahmed. "And Ghazi [Salaheddin] and
Turabi were with Bashir for so long, they're just the same as him."

 

Third, the opposition parties are divided, despite the impression the NCF
tries to portray through its joint statements. The DUP was enticed to join
the government's coalition in 2011 in return for a few ministerial posts. In
January 2014, Mr Bashir set up a consultative process, called the "national
dialogue". It has further split the opposition. Mr Salaheddin called it
"dead" after Mr Mahdi's arrest in May, which caused the NUP to pull out.

 

Fourth, opposition in Sudan has often been military in nature. Khartoum is
still fighting civil wars against rebels in Darfur in the east, the Nuba
Mountains in the southwest, and the Blue Nile state in the south-east. The
more radical opponents of Mr Bashir's regime, in particular from these
conflict areas, believe the rebels are more likely to bring about change
than Khartoum's neutered opposition politics. The leaders of the unarmed
opposition parties, many outside the capital complain, are drawn from the
same Khartoum elite that has dominated politics for decades.

 

In August 2014, the NUP's Mr Mahdi signed the Paris Declaration with a loose
coalition of rebel groups known as the Sudan Revolutionary Front (SRF). This
agreement was "a breakthrough for a peaceful political settlement in Sudan",
Mr Mahdi told Africa in Fact. It calls for an end to the civil wars and the
creation of a fairer Sudan based on recognition of its diverse population.
The NUP and the SRF also promised to boycott the elections scheduled for
April 2015 unless they were organised by a transitional government.

 

This alliance, between the armed opposition and the most prominent leader of
the unarmed opposition, scared the ruling NCP. Mr Mahdi's daughter Mariam
was detained for a month after she returned to Khartoum from France, and Mr
Mahdi has not returned home.

 

So far the other opposition parties have not followed in the NUP's
footsteps, from a mixture of fear and their own distrust of the rebels. The
most effective opposition to Mr Bashir is likely to be an alliance between
all his antagonists-the rebels, opposition parties and youth groups. But
like their country, they are deeply divided.

 
<http://gga.org/stories/editions/aif-29-africas-opposition-in-pieces/khartou
m-doldrums/image/image_view_fullscreen> Khartoum doldrums

Omar al-Bashir

 





image001.jpg
(image/jpeg attachment: image001.jpg)

Received on Mon Dec 01 2014 - 16:21:29 EST

Dehai Admin
© Copyright DEHAI-Eritrea OnLine, 1993-2013
All rights reserved