Libya war continues three years after Gaddafi assassination
Abayomi Azikiwe
2014-10-26
Libya is still in turmoil. The present situation is the direct result of the
war of regime-change led by the CIA, the Pentagon and NATO during 2011. U.S.
policy is designed to overthrow all of the sovereign and anti-imperialist
governments throughout Africa and the Middle East.
On October 20, 2011, the leader of the North African state of Libya was
brutally assassinated in the city of Sirte. Col. Muammar Gaddafi had been
leading a struggle to defend his country from a war of regime-change
coordinated and financed by the United States and NATO.
Since the overthrow of the Jamahiriya system of government in Libya, the
social conditions prevailing inside the country are by no means stable.
Various factions, most of which were utilized as ground troops in the
Pentagon-NATO aerial war between March 19 and October 31 of 2011, remained
locked in a mortal conflict for control over the oil-rich state.
Conflicting sources of political power backed up by armed militias exist in
the two largest cities of Tripoli, the capital, and Benghazi in the east
where the counter-revolution against Gaddafi began. Areas in the south of
the country have armed themselves against the U.S.-installed regimes in
Tripoli and Benghazi often in sympathy with the previous system under the
Jamahiriya.
Two regional states which participated in the imperialist-engineered war
against Libya, Egypt and the United Arab Emirates (UAE), have been carrying
out periodic airstrikes against alleged "Islamist" strongholds in various
locations in the east and west. Also the former renegade Gen. Khalifa
Hefter, a longtime Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) asset, has mounted a
bid for power utilizing sophisticated weapons and air strikes.
OIL PRODUCTION RISING DESPITE INTERNAL CONFLICT
For several months during 2014 oil production in Libya was down
considerably. Conflicts between various labor organizations in addition to
clashes among the militias resulted in the decline of barrels-per-day
extraction to almost nil.
A dispute over who could actually sell Libyan oil on the international
market was eventually addressed by the U.S. when it sent a naval warship to
reclaim cargo traded by interests inside the country who were not endorsed
by Washington. Subsequent efforts aimed at resolution of the disagreements
have still not cleared the way for a consistent boost in production.
Unrest has erupted again surrounding which political group claiming
authority in Libya would control the proceeds from oil sales. Both the
parties controlling the capital of Tripoli who are often labelled as
"Islamists" and the "government in exile" in the eastern city of Tobruk, say
they are entitled to the revenue generated from the trade in oil.
With the decline in prices on the global market during October the situation
involving the struggle over the control of oil in Libya prompted the
attention of the Wall Street Journal. Efforts by five western countries
designated by the United Nations to reach a political settlement in the
Libyan quagmire have failed, and consequently, the major imperialist powers
are concerned about the supply of oil and the role of Libya in the process.
"In a joint statement late Saturday, France, Italy, Germany, the U.K. and
the U.S. said they supported the U.N.-sponsored peace talks and a cessation
of hostilities, "noted the Wall Street Journal. "The five governments
condemned the violence by Islamist group Ansar al-Shariah, voiced concern
about the attacks of the renegade general and said they were ready to
sanction those threatening Libya's security." (Oct. 19)
This same article went on to point out that "Libya is normally one of
Europe's largest oil suppliers, but disruptions since the fall of strongman
Moammar Gadhafi in 2011 have reduced its contribution to the continent's oil
supply." Therefore, even the publication of the international finance
capital has to openly acknowledge that the Pentagon-NATO policy of
regime-change in Libya has disrupted oil supplies to the European continent.
The Libya Dawn group which is contesting control of the state with the
ostensible moderate group led by Prime Minister Abdullah al-Thani, who
called themselves the House of Representatives, sent their own oil minister,
Mashallah al-Zawie, to Turkey to participate in an industry conference held
in Istanbul. The rival group headed by al-Thani based in Tobruk dismissed
the Central Bank director Sadiq Kabir and claims they have control of the
revenue from oil sales.
Nonetheless, the Wall Street Journal reports that "officials at NOC (the
state-owned National Oil Co.) and at the central bank subsidiary which
receives payments from oil buyers said revenues had continued to flow to its
Tripoli-based accounts. Mr. al-Kabir also remains in office, they said."
Such confusion over which entity controls Libyan oil could very well hamper
the country's future production and exports projections. Libyan oil
officials say production is at 850,000 barrels a day, marking an increase of
40,000 barrels compared with earlier in Oct., suggesting that some
facilities have boosted their output. In contrast operations at oil fields
in eastern Libya have been interrupted by labor unrest led by workers
seeking jobs at the facilities.
IMPERIALISTS CONTINUE PROXY WAR IN LIBYA
The present situation in Libya is the direct result of the war of
regime-change led by the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), the Pentagon and
NATO during 2011. U.S. policy is designed to overthrow all of the sovereign
and anti-imperialist governments throughout Africa and the Middle East.
Consequently, the outcome of the current situation in the regions of North
Africa and the Middle East will be critical in the future course of
imperialist militarism worldwide. Obviously, these policies in Afghanistan,
Iraq, Yemen, Sudan, Syria and Libya have prompted massive destabilization of
these societies including the vast increase in internally displaced persons
and refugees.
Libya, which under the years of the Jamahiriya-Gaddafi rule was the most
prosperous state in Africa, now is a major source of instability in the
region. The response of aerial bombardments from Egypt and the UAE will only
further the generalized sense of lawlessness and terror.
Only the Libyan people themselves united around a political program of
national unity and genuine sovereignty will be able to reverse the current
malaise. The plans suggested involving the direct intervention of thousands
of NATO troops to Libya under the rubric of the United Nations would
eventually result in greater anti-western sentiments already prevalent
throughout the country.
What the role of the U.S. in Libya has proven is that Washington and Wall
Street has no rational policy towards Africa and the Middle East. Its
interventionist posture will only breed more anti-U.S. consciousness and
mass resistance to imperialist control.
* Abayomi Azikiwe is editor of Pan African News Wire.