[image: Attack on Sovereignty: The United States is the New World
Order]<
http://images.sodahead.com/polls/003463485/wplogo_xlarge.png>
Attack on Sovereignty: The United States is the New World Order
Source :
http://de.sodahead.com/united-states/attack-on-sovereignty-the-united-states-is-the-new-world-order/question-3463485/
http://www.thedailybell.com/28586/Paul-Craig-Roberts-Attack-On-Sovereignty
http://starkravingviking.blogspot.de/2013/01/attack-on-sovereignty.html
http://www.infowars.com/attack-on-sovereignty/
By PAUL CRAIG ROBERTS | PCR.ORG <
http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/> |
JANUARY 16, 2012
Those concerned about “The New World Order” speak as if the United States
is coming under the control of an outside conspiratorial force. In fact, it
is the US that is the New World Order. That is what the American unipolar
world, about which China, Russia, and Iran complain, is all about.
Washington has demonstrated that it has no respect for its own laws and
Constitution, much less any respect for international law and the law and
sovereignty of other countries. All that counts is Washington’s will as the
pursuit of hegemony moves Washington closer to becoming a world dictator.
The examples are so numerous someone should compile them into a book.
During the Reagan administration the long established bank secrecy laws of
Switzerland had to bend to Washington’s will. The Clinton administration
attacked Serbia, murdered civilians and sent Serbia’s president to be tried
as a war criminal for defending his country.
The US government engages in widespread spying on Europeans’ emails and
telephone calls that is unrelated to terrorism. Julian Assange is confined
to the Ecuadoran embassy in London, because Washington won’t permit the
British government to honor his grant of political asylum. Washington
refuses to comply with a writ of habeas corpus from a British count to turn
over Yunus Rahmatullah whose detention a British Court of Appeals has ruled
to be unlawful. Washington imposes sanctions on other countries and
enforces them by cutting sovereign nations that do not comply out of the
international payments system.
Last week the Obama regime warned the British government that it was a
violation of US interests for the UK to pull out of the European Union or
reduce its ties to the EU in any way.
In other words, the sovereignty of Great Britain is not a choice to be made
by the British government or people. The decision is made by Washington in
keeping with Washington’s interest.
The British are so accustomed to being Washington’s colony that deputy
prime minister Nick Clegg and a group of UK business executives quickly
lined up with Washington.
This leaves Great Britain in a quandary. The British economy, once a
manufacturing powerhouse, has been reduced to the City of London, Britain’s
equivalent to Wall Street. London, like New York, is a world financial
center of which there are none in Europe. Without its financial status,
there wouldn’t be much left of the UK.
It is because of the City’s financial importance that the UK, alone of the
EU member states, kept the British pound as its currency and did not join
the euro. Because the UK has its own currency and central bank, the UK was
spared the sovereign debt crisis that has plagued other EU member states.
The Bank of England, like the Federal Reserve in the US, was able to bail
out its own banks, whereas other EU states sharing a common currency could
not create money, and the European Central Bank is prohibited by its
charter (at Germany’s insistence) from bailing out member states.
The quandary for the UK is that the solution to the sovereign debt crisis
toward which the EU is moving is to strip the member governments of their
fiscal sovereignty. For the individual countries, the spending, taxing and,
thereby, deficit or surplus positions of the member countries’ budgets will
be set by EU central authority. This would mean the end of national
sovereignty for European countries.
For Britain to remain an EU member while retaining its own currency and
central bank would mean special status for Great Britain. The UK would be
the only member of the EU that remained a sovereign country. What are the
chances that the UK will be permitted such exceptional status? Is this
acceptable to Germany and France?
If the British are to fold themselves into Europe, they will have to give
up their currency, central bank, their law, and their economic status as a
world financial center and accept governance by the EU bureaucracy. The
British will have to give up being somebody and become nobody.
It would, however, free the UK from being Washington’s puppet unless the EU
itself is Washington’s puppet.
According to reports, sometime this year Scotland, a constituent part of
the UK, is to vote on leaving the UK and becoming an independent country.
How ironic that as the UK debates its dismemberment the country itself
faces being merged into a multi-national state.
Attack on Sovereignty: The United States is the New World Order
<a href="
http://www.eritrea-chat.com/attack-on-sovereignty-the-united-states-is-the-new-world-order/header4-2/"
rel="attachment wp-att-28727"><img src="
http://www.eritrea-chat.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/header4.png" alt=""
title="header4" width="600" height="183" class="aligncenter size-full
wp-image-28727" /></a>
Source ;
http://de.sodahead.com/united-states/attack-on-sovereignty-the-united-states-is-the-new-world-order/question-3463485/
By PAUL CRAIG ROBERTS | PCR.ORG | JANUARY 16, 2012
Those concerned about “The New World Order” speak as if the United States
is coming under the control of an outside conspiratorial force. In fact, it
is the US that is the New World Order. That is what the American unipolar
world, about which China, Russia, and Iran complain, is all about.
Washington has demonstrated that it has no respect for its own laws and
Constitution, much less any respect for international law and the law and
sovereignty of other countries. All that counts is Washington’s will as the
pursuit of hegemony moves Washington closer to becoming a world dictator.
The examples are so numerous someone should compile them into a book.
During the Reagan administration the long established bank secrecy laws of
Switzerland had to bend to Washington’s will. The Clinton administration
attacked Serbia, murdered civilians and sent Serbia’s president to be tried
as a war criminal for defending his country.
The US government engages in widespread spying on Europeans’ emails and
telephone calls that is unrelated to terrorism. Julian Assange is confined
to the Ecuadoran embassy in London, because Washington won’t permit the
British government to honor his grant of political asylum. Washington
refuses to comply with a writ of habeas corpus from a British count to turn
over Yunus Rahmatullah whose detention a British Court of Appeals has ruled
to be unlawful. Washington imposes sanctions on other countries and
enforces them by cutting sovereign nations that do not comply out of the
international payments system.
<iframe width="600" height="400" src="
http://www.youtube.com/embed/jY8EVg3-JW0" frameborder="0"
allowfullscreen></iframe>
Last week the Obama regime warned the British government that it was a
violation of US interests for the UK to pull out of the European Union or
reduce its ties to the EU in any way.
In other words, the sovereignty of Great Britain is not a choice to be made
by the British government or people. The decision is made by Washington in
keeping with Washington’s interest.
The British are so accustomed to being Washington’s colony that deputy
prime minister Nick Clegg and a group of UK business executives quickly
lined up with Washington.
This leaves Great Britain in a quandary. The British economy, once a
manufacturing powerhouse, has been reduced to the City of London, Britain’s
equivalent to Wall Street. London, like New York, is a world financial
center of which there are none in Europe. Without its financial status,
there wouldn’t be much left of the UK.
It is because of the City’s financial importance that the UK, alone of the
EU member states, kept the British pound as its currency and did not join
the euro. Because the UK has its own currency and central bank, the UK was
spared the sovereign debt crisis that has plagued other EU member states.
The Bank of England, like the Federal Reserve in the US, was able to bail
out its own banks, whereas other EU states sharing a common currency could
not create money, and the European Central Bank is prohibited by its
charter (at Germany’s insistence) from bailing out member states.
The quandary for the UK is that the solution to the sovereign debt crisis
toward which the EU is moving is to strip the member governments of their
fiscal sovereignty. For the individual countries, the spending, taxing and,
thereby, deficit or surplus positions of the member countries’ budgets will
be set by EU central authority. This would mean the end of national
sovereignty for European countries.
For Britain to remain an EU member while retaining its own currency and
central bank would mean special status for Great Britain. The UK would be
the only member of the EU that remained a sovereign country. What are the
chances that the UK will be permitted such exceptional status? Is this
acceptable to Germany and France?
If the British are to fold themselves into Europe, they will have to give
up their currency, central bank, their law, and their economic status as a
world financial center and accept governance by the EU bureaucracy. The
British will have to give up being somebody and become nobody.
It would, however, free the UK from being Washington’s puppet unless the EU
itself is Washington’s puppet.
According to reports, sometime this year Scotland, a constituent part of
the UK, is to vote on leaving the UK and becoming an independent country.
How ironic that as the UK debates its dismemberment the country itself
faces being merged into a multi-national state.
<iframe width="600" height="400" src="
http://www.youtube.com/embed/0M9goBhh3tU?list=PL8232D63164247EF6"
frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Attack On Sovereignty
The Alex Jones Channel Alex Jones Show podcast Prison Planet TV
Infowars.com Twitter Alex Jones' Facebook Infowars store
Paul Craig Roberts
Infowars.com
Jan 16, 2013
A d v e r t i s e m e n t
It is because of the City’s financial importance that the UK, alone of the
EU member states, kept the British pound as its currency and did not join
the euro. Because the UK has its own currency and central bank, the UK was
spared the sovereign debt crisis that has plagued other EU member states.
The Bank of England, like the Federal Reserve in the US, was able to bail
out its own banks, whereas other EU states sharing a common currency could
not create money, and the European Central Bank is prohibited by its
charter (at Germany’s insistence) from bailing out member states.
The quandary for the UK is that the solution to the sovereign debt crisis
toward which the EU is moving is to strip the member governments of their
fiscal sovereignty. For the individual countries, the spending, taxing and,
thereby, deficit or surplus positions of the member countries’ budgets will
be set by EU central authority. This would mean the end of national
sovereignty for European countries.
For Britain to remain an EU member while retaining its own currency and
central bank would mean special status for Great Britain. The UK would be
the only member of the EU that remained a sovereign country. What are the
chances that the UK will be permitted such exceptional status? Is this
acceptable to Germany and France?
If the British are to fold themselves into Europe, they will have to give
up their currency, central bank, their law, and their economic status as a
world financial center and accept governance by the EU bureaucracy. The
British will have to give up being somebody and become nobody.
It would, however, free the UK from being Washington’s puppet unless the EU
itself is Washington’s puppet.
According to reports, sometime this year Scotland, a constituent part of
the UK, is to vote on leaving the UK and becoming an independent country.
How ironic that as the UK debates its dismemberment the country itself
faces being merged into a multi-national state.
Dr. Paul Craig Roberts is the father of Reaganomics and the former head of
policy at the Department of Treasury. He is a columnist and was previously
the editor of the Wall Street Journal. His latest book, “How the Economy
Was Lost: The War of the Worlds,” details why America is disintegrating.
<iframe width="600" height="400" src="
http://www.youtube.com/embed/SctOyyteias" frameborder="0"
allowfullscreen></iframe>
Received on Fri Jan 18 2013 - 20:32:06 EST
