| Jan-Mar 09 | Apr-Jun 09 | Jul-Sept 09 | Oct-Dec 09 | Jan-May 10 | Jun-Dec 10 | Jan-May 11 | Jun-Dec 11 | Jan-May 12 |

[Dehai-WN] Globalresearch.ca: Sudan: Protests and the Politics of Regime Change

From: Berhane Habtemariam <Berhane.Habtemariam_at_gmx.de_at_dehai.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 14:37:54 +0200

Sudan: Protests and the Politics of Regime Change

 

by Eric Draitser


http://www.globalresearch.ca/coverStoryPictures2/31977.jpg

 <http://www.globalresearch.ca> Global Research, July 20, 2012

The protests that have broken out in Sudan are, on the surface, the
manifestation of legitimate grievances. Portrayed in the Western media as a
direct response to austerity measures implemented by Sudanese President Omar
al-Bashir, these protests indicate a strong current of dissatisfaction among
the people of the country. However, seen from a broader, more critical
perspective, the demonstrations are the tangible fruits of a carefully
constructed destabilization campaign incorporating opposition political
parties, civil society groups, non-governmental organizations (NGOs),
Hollywood celebrities and Western financiers. These powerful forces have
aligned against the government in Khartoum in order to execute the
geopolitical agenda of the imperialist ruling class in the West.

The Development of the Protests

The immediate impetus for the protests, which broke out in recent weeks in
and around the capital of Khartoum, was the announcement of the removal of
fuel subsidies. This troubling development, coupled with other austerity
measures such as the reduction of government jobs and the devaluation of the
currency, were designed to mitigate the effects of soaring inflation in
Sudan. However, because of the integral role of fuel prices in the Sudanese
economy, the move seemed to spark mass indignation. In a country already
dogged by high unemployment and rampant poverty, these difficult decisions
inflamed already high tensions throughout the country.

Reports from inside Sudan suggest that a small group of female demonstrators
gathered outside dormitories at the University of Khartoum and began
protesting the fuel subsidy cuts, among other issues. This was the first in
what became a series of daily demonstrations against a whole host of
grievances. Central among these was the feeling, widespread among
particularly young people, that the government in Khartoum was punishing the
people while continuing to spend "lavishly" on defense. Many groups
directly involved in the protest movement, groups such as Sudan Change Now
and the popularized twitter moniker #SudanRevolts, have used the
demonstrations as a springboard for a much broader and, it could be argued,
more opportunistic agenda, one that is directly in line with the
geopolitical interests of the United States and the Western imperialist
ruling class: regime change.

This is, of course, not to diminish the genuine grievances of many of the
demonstrators. Instead, it is important to maintain a critical understanding
of the way in which these sort of movements are hijacked or otherwise
cynically manipulated through a variety of means by those in the West for
whom power and hegemony are the goals above all else.

The Wizards Behind the Curtain

In order to understand the way in which the protests in Sudan, and movements
like them all over the world, are manipulated, influenced, or otherwise
controlled by Western powers, we must first examine the major players and
the often deliberately obscured connections between them, western
intelligence networks, and international financiers.

In Sudan, we've seen an extraordinary proliferation of western-financed NGOs
that have entrenched themselves in the civil society of the country,
particularly in an urban center such as Khartoum. Organizations such as
Sudan Now and the Enough Project (the latter of which is directly connected
to George Clooney, the US State Department and George Soros) indicate the
degree to which humanitarian concerns and NGOs are utilized by the US
imperialists as cover for their geopolitical agenda. In fact, in the case
of Clooney and the Enough Project, we see the presence of John Prendergast,
head of the organization and former Director for African Affairs at the
National Security Council. His participation, not to mention his close
relationship to UN Ambassador Susan Rice, Samantha Power, and the
International Crisis Group, should illustrate the degree to which this and
other organizations working inside Sudan are either directly or tangentially
part of the US intelligence establishment.

The Enough Project is also significant because of its ability to sell a
Western-constructed narrative of Sudan to an unsuspecting and generally
ill-informed public. George Clooney who, along with Council on Foreign
Relations member Angelina Jolie, has cultivated an image as a politically
progressive humanitarian, is able to construct a particular discourse in the
American public's imagination: Bashir is a monster and the United States
must act decisively including possibly using force, to remove him from
power. Such a dominant narrative, once entrenched in the public discourse,
becomes difficult, if not impossible, to deconstruct.

The Enough Project and other humanitarian organizations alone are not the
whole story, however. Important players inside the country are also playing
an integral role in the attempt at regime change in Sudan. One such
important individual is Dr. Hassan al-Turabi, head of the opposition Popular
Congress Party (PCP), one of the leading factions within the
often-fragmented political opposition. Turabi, a longtime "progressive
Islamist", is not merely a major player in Sudanese politics. In fact, he's
one of the leading "experts" on Sudan with long-standing connections to the
US State Department-funded National Endowment for Democracy (NED). In fact,
as recently as 2008, Turabi was one of the keynote speakers at the NED in
Washington DC where he presented on, among other things, how to bring about
regime change in Sudan. Though the usual covers of "democracy promotion",
"transparency", and other such high-minded abstractions are utilized by
Turabi and the NED, these are merely the rhetorical devices used to obscure
the obvious goal of such a conference.

Turabi's association with the NED and the US intelligence community is not
only significant in demonstrating the role that those institutions are
playing in destabilizing Sudan. It also demonstrates the way in which the
US imperialists have long-standing ties with so-called "Islamists", a
conclusion made ever more apparent by the ascension of the Muslim
Brotherhood in Egypt and the deployment of Al Qaeda and other religious
militants in Libya, Syria, and elsewhere. In this way, a clearer
understanding develops of just how the Western imperialists are able to
utilize a variety of means, many of which are "Islamist" in nature, to
destabilize regimes they deem to be unfriendly.

International Subversion

Aside from having to deal with powerful forces engaged in the internal
struggles in Sudan, Bashir's government has also been faced with
extraordinary international pressure. Not only has Bashir himself been
accused by the ICC (itself an arm of US-NATO power projection) of being a
war criminal for his purported role in the conflict in Darfur, he has also
watched as the United States and other Western powers fomented a brutal
civil war, only to then partition the country, carving out South Sudan, and
create the conditions for the current situation. Essentially, Bashir has
had to try to maintain his grip on the country in the face of a
multi-pronged effort to destroy his regime and the Sudanese state.

The conflict with South Sudan has taken a heavy toll on the Sudanese
economy. Because of the loss of an estimated 75% of total oil reserves
located in the South, inflation has dramatically increased and Khartoum's
revenue from trade with China and other major oil importers has decreased
sharply. Additionally, the skirmishes and other armed conflicts between
North and South have focused Bashir's attention to the Abyei Province and
other border areas and, consequently, away from other pressing concerns
inside the country. This was precisely what the Western powers intended
when they began pushing for the partition of the country a few years ago.

The imperialist aggression against Libya was an indication to many keen
observers that the imperialist ruling class had every intention of
completely consolidating control over all of North Africa by removing any
vestiges of nationalism and any leaders who might pose a challenge to
AFRICOM and the neo-colonial agenda. Gaddafi met his barbaric end at the
hands of a vicious lynch-mob or, as they're called in the West, "freedom
fighters". They and their NTC masters such as Mahmoud Jibril, now the head
of the so-called Libyan government, were merely puppets of the West,
supported for purposes of economic exploitation of natural resources and to
create a safe haven for terrorists to then menace the rest of the region.
Likewise, Bashir is on the target list and, without taking precautions,
could meet the same fate.

What Do They Want?

The United States and its western partners have a number of goals in seeking
regime change in Sudan. As is the case in so many other conflicts around
the world, the main objective is to block Chinese economic development. The
Chinese have, for years, been the biggest importer of Sudanese oil and,
other than Angola, Sudan was its main supplier on the continent. Aside from
oil however, Sudan had become one of the main markets for Chinese economic
investment. In fact, by 2002, Sudan was China's fifth biggest source of
revenue and had become a major player in the power generation and other
markets. For these reasons, China began to pose a threat to US hegemony in
East Africa and, from the perspective of the imperialists, had to be
checked.

Aside from China, the United States has other geopolitical and economic
reasons for destabilizing Sudan. Washington seeks to consolidate control
over East and Central Africa and, in order to do so, must eliminate one of
their biggest obstacles, Sudan. The US has gone to painstaking lengths to
maintain compliant puppet governments in Rwanda, Uganda, Burundi, and
elsewhere. In so doing, the US is able to keep Central and East Africa
under their thumb, at least to some degree. By destroying the Bashir regime,
these imperialists believe they will be able to project US hegemony forward
for the foreseeable future and, as a result, secure unfettered access to the
wealth of raw materials in the region.

There is also an element of opportunism to this plan. The West looks to
capitalize on the still viable discursive construct of the Arab Spring as a
means to their end. So long as this idea can inspire masses of disaffected
youth to take to the streets, the United States and its partners can
continue to impose their will in the region. However, as the conflict in
Syria has unequivocally shown, without such mythological pretexts, it
becomes impossible for the imperialists to achieve their goals.

In examining the situation in Sudan, it is important to keep in mind that a
critical, anti-imperialist perspective does not mean that one absolves
Bashir of any wrongdoing. In fact, it should illustrate the ways in which
Bashir and his government have contributed to creating the climate that
breeds such protests. However, by analyzing this uprising and investigating
simultaneously the positive and insidious forces at work within it, we can
begin to apply a broad understanding to the issue and, in so doing, work to
prevent the Western imperialist ruling class from destroying yet another
sovereign state.


Eric Draitser is a frequent contributor to Global Research






      ------------[ Sent via the dehai-wn mailing list by dehai.org]--------------

image001.jpg
(image/jpeg attachment: image001.jpg)

Received on Fri Jul 20 2012 - 08:37:53 EDT
Dehai Admin
© Copyright DEHAI-Eritrea OnLine, 1993-2012
All rights reserved