| Jan-Mar 09 | Apr-Jun 09 | Jul-Sept 09 | Oct-Dec 09 | Jan-May 10 | Jun-Dec 10 | Jan-May 11 | Jun-Dec 11 |

[Dehai-WN] Independent.co.ug: Building a state from scratch

From: Berhane Habtemariam <Berhane.Habtemariam_at_gmx.de_at_dehai.org>
Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 14:04:09 +0200

ate-from-scratch> Building a state from scratch

Saturday, 21 April 2012 13:30

By Andrew M. Mwenda

What the leaders of South Sudan need to avoid as they begin the task of
building a state and moulding a nation

Last week I was in Juba, South Sudan on the invitation by friends from the
Sudan People's Liberation Movement (SPLM). It is an invitation I had been
postponing for nearly two years, unsure what awaited me. But I knew it was a
great opportunity to witness at firsthand an experiment in building a state
from scratch. There are hardly any new states emerging from nowhere unto the
world scene anymore. I was both saddened and thrilled by what I witnessed
during that brief visit.

There is nothing in South Sudan: there are hardly any roads, schools,
hospitals, railways, power dams, water supply systems, bridges etc in the
literal sense. There is no functional education or healthcare delivery
system. There is hardly a functional judiciary, civil service or police
force. The only thing that exists in South Sudan that is closer to what you
find in modern states is the army. So soldiers have to do nearly everything
- be the doctors and nurses, teachers and lecturers, legislators and
ministers, man the civil service, be judges and prosecutors, run the
intelligence services and airport administration - everything.

Therefore, as I moved around Juba and slightly beyond, something struck me:
these people; inexperienced in the art of government, have a monumental task
of trying to build a government and all its functions all at once. They have
to build physical infrastructure and equip themselves with skills to run the
ministries. Building hospitals, schools, roads and office blocks is the
easiest part. With oil money, South Sudan can hire the best architects to
design and the best construction companies to build anything. The hard part
is building systems to deliver healthcare and education services, maintain
roads and bridges, etc.

I was saddened by the sheer scale of the challenge given the absence of
human skill to deliver on the tasks. But I was thrilled by the opportunity
to begin from nowhere and do great things. Without skills, South Sudanese
will bungle many things up. Contractors will cheat on projects. Individuals
will take advantage of internal weaknesses to divert vital resources from
their intended public purposes to personal gain. Donors will recommend and
South Sudan will accept well tested policies and institutions - both those
that have worked best in the West and those most unsuited for the new
nation's real challenges and much more.

Then there is politics; the local and regional (involving the wider Sudan
and its own schisms), and the international. Internally, South Sudan has
primarily the task of building an identity of the new nation from the myriad
"tribes" that constitute it. This will be the most important task that can
be best served by the promotion of a national language. The second most
important task will be to build a state and focus attention on institutions
like the army, police, intelligence and judiciary to ensure that the state
can perform its most basic function - protection of people's lives and
property. To perform these basic functions, South Sudan will need money.
Therefore, the government will need to build institutions for economic
management like an effective central bank (for monetary management), a good
ministry of finance (for fiscal management) and a strong tax administration
system (for resource mobilisation).

Donors and other elites would talk about democracy, human rights, economic
development etc. All these are necessary but not primary. South Sudan needs
to begin early to ignore such voices. The government needs to be clear about
what is primary, what is secondary and what comes last. An attempt to
provide equal attention to all challenges is not a formula for success.
Particular attention has to be placed on those things that are vital for
national survival and security is most paramount. But because the provision
of security needs to be backed by money, the promotion of good macroeconomic
policies and creation of institutions to do this go together.

The experience gained in building an effective security system - police,
army and intelligence services - will be vital when government attention
extends its focus to building affective systems for the delivery of services
like education and health, transport and communication systems for the
country. The dilemma for South Sudan is that because it has limited human
capital, it has to move very fast to invest in its people i.e. funding them
to acquire education and skills. Initially, I would suggest training people
abroad especially in the region, as it slowly builds its own capacity.

This is a task that will take generations. By paying special attention to
building local security capacity, South Sudan will be able to effectively
counter schemes from Khartoum, tell international human rights groups to
back off and hold the international community seeking to usurp its
sovereignty at bay. The new nation will also need to avoid too much World
Bank, United Nations, and especially the kind Western European involvement
in its affairs. Many of these groups will be well intentioned but they will
seek to implement policies and practices that work best in their countries
and will most likely be least suited for a new nation like South Sudan.

In this direction, South Sudan will need to build alliances with regional
states like Tanzania, Uganda, Ethiopia, Eritrea and Rwanda to learn how each
one of them has built itself from scratch by reorganising the colonial and
quasi-colonial structures to meet domestic needs. The danger of course will
be an attempt to re-invent the wheel. There is so much good in our inherited
colonial institutions and practices. The challenge is how to domesticate
them and bring them into alignment with local peculiarities. However, South
Sudan has to know that there are no solutions from the experience of its
neighbours for its own development; there are vital lessons.

Democracy is a vital public good that few would argue against. But it needs
many things in place for it to work properly. This is the lesson South Sudan
should take heed of. A rushed and over ambitious drive to democratise before
the state's own capacity to mediate conflicts has been put in place is a
recipe for disaster. And South Sudan should remember that democracy is a
journey of generational time, not an event that can be achieved in one day
or week or month or year.



      ------------[ Sent via the dehai-wn mailing list by dehai.org]--------------
Received on Sun Apr 22 2012 - 08:04:12 EDT
Dehai Admin
© Copyright DEHAI-Eritrea OnLine, 1993-2012
All rights reserved