| Jan-Mar 09 | Apr-Jun 09 | Jul-Sept 09 | Oct-Dec 09 | Jan-May 10 | Jun-Dec 10 | Jan-May 11 | Jun-Dec 11 |

[Dehai-WN] Vibeghana.com: The UN Secretary-General Must Tread Cautiously in Africa Part I

From: Berhane Habtemariam <Berhane.Habtemariam_at_gmx.de_at_dehai.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 22:53:15 +0100

The UN Secretary-General Must Tread Cautiously in Africa Part I

January 30, 2012 | Filed under: <http://vibeghana.com/category/opinions/>
Opinions | Posted by: <http://vibeghana.com/author/vibeghanaeditor2006/>

The UN Secretary-General, Ban Ki-Moon, is reported to have urged African
leaders to respect gay rights, saying that discrimination based on sexual
orientation or gender identity "prompted governments to treat people as
second class citizens or even criminals" (BBC News, January 29, 2012). He
made the appeal in his opening address at the African Union summit in Addis

Homosexual acts are illegal in most African countries, including key Western
allies such as Uganda, Nigeria, Kenya, Egypt, Ghana, and Botswana. Both the
United States and the United Kingdom recently warned they would use foreign
aid to push for homosexuality to be decriminalized on the socially
conservative continent, as the BBC put it.

By taking up this issue at this summit, Ban Ki-Moon has waded into a
controversy that will definitely pit him and the organization he heads
against African countries that detest homosexuality. It means he is on a
collision course and shouldn't be surprised at the outcome.

We won't give Ban Ki-Moon the chance to dictate to us how to live our lives.
What he chose to speak on at the AU summit had better be left to each
country to handle as it deems fit. Nigeria has already passed a law against
homosexuality, and the other countries won't budge just because he has waded
into the controversy. Africans don't need any prompting from him to know and
to do what will work well for them at the socio-cultural level. It is none
of his business.

He must be told aboveboard that Africa's immediate priorities don't include
the gay, lesbian, or queer phenomenon. Africa doesn't really pride itself on
that phenomenon to be bothered by a UN Secretary-General who seems not to
know what to do to help the continent advance and end the exploitation and
destabilization by the powerful member-states which control the UN and use
it to achieve their cynical purposes.

Africa needs redemption from the quagmire into which the forces manipulating
the UN itself have thrown it. We may acknowledge that Africa's persistent
under-development is partly caused by several self-created problems such as
incompetent leadership and visionlessness, misplaced priorities, bribery and
corruption, political instability, and social strife. But by the same token,
we can't rule out the insidiousness of the West in the widespread
excruciating poverty that has become the lot of the continent.
We know of the 1948 UN Declaration of Fundamental Human rights and
acknowledge the fact that gay/lesbian/queer issues have human rights aspects
to consider. We understand that that Declaration is still relevant to the
world. But we question the manner in which this Declaration of Fundamental
Human Rights itself has been enforced all over the years.

We respect Ban Ki-Moon's desire to draw attention to those gay/lesbian/queer
issues. We don't, however, accept his raising such issues to the level that
his call suggests at a summit by the AU to deliberate on Africa's
development problems.
Considering the recent attempts (or threats?) by Britain's David Cameron and
the US' Barack Obama to tie development aid to these gay/lesbian/queer
issues, we can tell how the forces are arraying themselves against Africa
from the economic standpoint. Their threats won't scare anybody into doing
anything against the socio-cultural norms undergirding Africa's resistance
to the gay/lesbian/queer phenomenon.

The UN itself lacks credibility when it comes to human rights issues. It
hasn't done well either at several levels, two of which are particularly
disturbing-and which is why Ban Ki-Moon has no moral right to pontificate to
African leaders about moral issues.
UN's Hypocrisy

The hypocrisy (or betrayal?) of the UN under Ban Ki-Moon is obviously
unprecedented. Let's just take the "Arab Spring" as an example. Why will the
UN rush to endorse the devastation of Libya under Gaddafi by the so-called
International Coalition (NATO) only to turn a blind eye to the atrocities
being perpetrated by other rulers of countries in the Arab world facing the
wrath of their people?

Saudi Arabia sternly clamped down on the uprising against its monarchy and
moved ahead to provide military support to crush those in Bahrain fighting
against their rulers. Other Arab states were equally ruthless in suppressing
public dissension and the call for reforms, but the UN kept mum.

Then, Syria. For over 10 months now, the uprising in Syria has resulted in
many deaths and the situation deteriorates every passing day. Yet, the UN is
approaching this crisis in a half-hearted manner while the Arab League that
speedily supported NATO to hunt down and murder Gaddafi is unsure of what to
do to solve the problem. Its observer mission is a sham, a ploy designed to
throw dust into our eyes.

Take also the case of the Yemeni leader, Abdullah-Saleh and you will see how
incredibly impotent the UN is. After causing so much pain to his people and
doggedly refusing to step down, he is now in the United States under the
pretext of receiving medical attention. Such a person is not fit for the
hospital but the International Criminal Court, which the UN has given its
blessing to for the persecution of African politicians accused of crimes
against humanity.

What is it about the atrocities perpetrated by the Arab leaders still
clinging on to power by killing their own people that is not horrendous
enough to warrant their being prosecuted as is being done to the Africans?
But the UN will not do so because its paymasters and handlers don't want to
do anything to jeopardize their economic and strategic interests in the Arab
There are many other hot spots all over the world that the UN can't persuade
me it is handling indiscriminately. The Israeli-Palestinian crisis persists
because the UN can't be bold enough to call a spade a spade. It is caught up
in a maze that it has woven for itself as a result of its own hankying and

To be continued.

By Dr. Michael J.K. Bokor
E-mail: mjbokor_at_yahoo.com



      ------------[ Sent via the dehai-wn mailing list by dehai.org]--------------
Received on Mon Jan 30 2012 - 16:53:31 EST
Dehai Admin
© Copyright DEHAI-Eritrea OnLine, 1993-2012
All rights reserved