[Dehai-WN] Atimes.com: The myth of the 'China model' in Africa

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Berhane Habtemariam (Berhane.Habtemariam@gmx.de)
Date: Wed Sep 14 2011 - 09:56:46 EDT

The myth of the 'China model' in Africa
By Jian Junbo
Sep 14, 2011
LONDON - China's growing influence in Africa following its increasingly
active economic activity on the continent has been a target of criticism
from the West, particularly the United States. Recently, such criticism
seems to focus on whether the so-called "China model" is applicable to

This happens at a time as more and more Chinese are arguing that there is no
such thing as a "China model" - a mix of authoritarianism and socialist
market economy that contrasts with the Washington Consensus. From this
perspective, the latest Western criticism may be off target.

During a visit to Zambia in June, United States Secretary of State Hillary
Clinton indirectly referred to China's presence in Africa as "new
colonialism": "We saw that during colonial times, it was easy to come in,
take out natural resources, pay off leaders and leave. And when you leave,
you don't leave much behind for the people who are there. We don't want to
see a new colonialism in Africa."

Asked whether China was a role model for Africa, Clinton answered: "In the
long-run, medium-run, even short-run, no I don't [think so]." [1]

The Wall Street Journal on September 2 reported:

... Some US officials say the number of governments in Africa finding favor
with China's path of development gives Chinese firms an edge over US
competitors and reflects Beijing's strategic ambitions for the continent.

"It's quite clear that the model of state-led capitalism is being used as an
instrument of China's soft power," said Robert D Hormats, the US State
Department's Under Secretary for Economic Affairs. "It's part of a broad
notion that China's economic model is successful and can be used elsewhere."


All this shows Washington's increasing concern with China's growing
competitiveness with the US in Africa. Accusing China of neo-colonialism in
Africa now is nothing new - as early as 2006, the British Foreign Office
compared China's activities in Africa to what the West had done some 150
years before. But the criticism that China is trying to promote its own
political-economic "model" is something new.

Beijing has categorically refuted charges that a "China model" is planned
for Africa, but it will still likely become a label for China's engagement
in the continent and its would-be threat to the West.

Some African leaders have expressed a preference for Chinese-style
development. "China's model is telling us you can be successful without
following the Western example," said Arthur Mutambara, the deputy prime
minister, a member of an opposition party of Zimbabwe. "China is my favorite
country," he added. [3]

The whole debate revolves around a model that researchers and officials,
including Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao, feel is itself a misconception.

At a press conference after the conclusion of the annual session of the
National People's Congress in mid-March, Wen said: "We are still probing in
our reforms and construction, and never regard our development as a model."

A recent symposium hosted by the Central Party School - the top training
center of the Chinese Communist Party for senior cadres, officials and
researchers from various institutions of China discussed the so-called China
model. Their comments were published on a Beijing-based financial journal,
China's Reform, on September 1. [4]

A few participants did agree that there was a China model. Sun Liping, a
professor from Tsinghua University, said, "I think there is a China model.
It not only exists but also is in the final process of improvement." Wu Si,
vice president and executive editor of Yanhuang Chunqiu (China Through the
Ages) - a monthly magazine run by some reform-minded retired party elders,
argued the same line.

However, the majority of participants rejected the concept.

Zhu Lijia, a professor from the National Administrative Institution, argued
that the China model was a misconception, as China's modern social
institutions and values were still being developed or even at a primitive
stage. Cai Xia, a professor from the Central Party School, said that if a
China model meant a market economy dominated and pushed by the government,
then China had simply repeated what developed countries had done.

From this perspective, "We really have nothing new," Cai concluded. Xia
Yeliang, a professor from Peking University, argued that the so-called China
model in fact didn't go beyond the "East Asian Model" of the so-called Four
Asian Tigers - South Korea, Singapore, Taiwan and Hong Kong. "The definition
of China model used by either Chinese or foreigners is vague," Xia said.

Li Junru, former vice president of the Central Party School, had written in
2009 for Xuexi Shibao (Study Times) - a weekly newspaper run by the school,
that it was dangerous to define Chinese development as a China model. This
could lead to over-confidence and blind optimism in the country's
development, jeopardizing future reforms.

The ongoing debate underlines that the China model is a concept not accepted
by the Chinese government and many Chinese scholars.

Closer inspection of the concept reveals its similarities to the idea of a
"Beijing Consensus" created by American scholar Joshua Cooper Ramo, in 2004,
which has become widely used by Westerners to contrast with the Washington
Consensus. According to Ramo, the Beijing Consensus means fast economic
development in a state-controlled system, while the Washington Consensus
means liberal market and political democracy. From this perspective, the
China model is just another name for "Beijing Consensus", a label which is
also rejected by China.

Since Beijing doesn't recognize the China model internally, it certainly
denies the existence of a China model internationally. Liu Guijin, China's
special representative on African affairs, had said in a May interview that
China isn't promoting a particular development model to counter a Western
alternative, "What we are doing is sharing our experiences," he said.
"Believe me, China doesn't want to export our ideology, our governance, our
model. We don't regard it as a mature model." [5]

It is difficult, if not impossible, for other countries to copy China's
experience in development, especially when taking into consideration the
country's unique culture, which without doubt influences its modernization.
A very important aspect of Chinese culture that has played a significant
role in supporting and maintaining today's Chinese political and economic
system is the "Great Unification".

This idea originated from the unification of the Middle Kingdom by the Qin
Dynasty in 221 BC. From then on, unification became ingrained in Chinese
culture. Throughout history, China was always reunified after a period of

In such a big country, this "Great Unification" calls for centralization.
This means that China needs a special political and economic system. In
Africa, according to its history and reality, many countries have undergone
democratization since 1990s, but such a high degree of centralization is
hardly a deep-rooted idea. While rulers in some African countries may envy
Beijing's highly-centralized political power, the "Jasmine" revolutions"
have proved that many nations reject it.

China has grown into the world's second-largest economy in the past 30 or so
years from a poor, developing country. It is natural that some African
countries are eager to discover China's "secret" and boost their own
development. However, African nations cannot simply copy China's model. They
need to realize their own path of development.

Why has the US suddenly become so concerned with the so-called China model
becoming popular in Africa? This is likely due to US feelings of
helplessness as China expands its business interests and influence on the

Struggling for an economic recovery, entangled in two so-called "wars on
terror" in Afghanistan and Iraq and shifting its strategic focus onto a
"return to Asia", Washington at this stage can actually do little in Africa.
This remains a "failed continent" for the US, yet it still holds a grudge
about China moving in.

A CNN report on September 9 said [6]:

While Western countries are still important players in Africa's energy
sector, the deepening engagement of China in Africa's infrastructure,
mineral sector and telecommunications is creating "deep nervousness" in the
West, says David Shinn, the former US ambassador to Burkina Faso and

The competition in these areas, he explains, usually pits big Chinese
enterprises that are financially backed by Beijing's deep pockets against
Western companies that often have shareholders to consider and are
by-and-large acting independently of their governments' desires.

According to Shinn, this different system of government "does create
anxieties" because "the United States and the West see China filling all
kinds of voids that it thought it would eventually fill."

China overtook the United States as Africa's biggest trade partner in 2009,
according to OECD [Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development]
...figures, whereas in 2000 the United States' trade with Africa was three
times that of China's.

Shinn says that to the eyes of many African leaders China's capacity to move
fast, coupled with its policy of non-interference in other countries'
internal affairs, often makes Beijing a more attractive partner than the
West, whose policy in the continent is usually linked to conditions about
good governance and human-rights reforms.

So what can China do to satisfy Washington and the West? It should be
pointed out that the sectors and areas that China is engaged in in Africa
are mostly those the West declines to become involved in due to violence or
low returns. Yet the West complains about China's competition with them.

Should China pull all its businesses out of Africa? It is intriguing to note
that Western "concerns" come as the US and the European Union are seeking
increased Chinese investment. In today's increasingly inter-dependent world,
the US - though still the sole superpower - should be "generous" enough to
welcome China's business activities in Africa. After all, peaceful
competition is a core value of Western capitalism.

t-african-new-colonialism-.html> Clinton Chastises China on Internet,
African 'New Colonialism', Bloomberg, Jun 12, 2011.
2. <http://ayyaantuu.com/world/in-africa-u-s-watches-chinas-rise/> In
Africa, U.S. Watches China's Rise, Ayyaantoo Online News, Sep 2, 2011.
3. Ibid.
4. Click <http://magazine.caing.com/2011-08-30/100296415.html> here for the
Chinese text.
5. <http://ayyaantuu.com/world/in-africa-u-s-watches-chinas-rise/> In
Africa, U.S. Watches China's Rise, Ayyaantoo Online News, Sep 2, 2011.
> Is the West losing out to China in Africa? CNN, Sep 9, 2011.

Dr Jian Junbo, an assistant professor of the Institute of International
Studies at Fudan University, Shanghai, China, is currently an academic
visitor at London School of Economics and Political Science, United Kingdom.

      ------------[ Sent via the dehai-wn mailing list by dehai.org]--------------

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view
© Copyright DEHAI-Eritrea OnLine, 2001
All rights reserved